Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery /

Integrated project delivery (IPD) seeks to improve project outcomes through a collaborative approach of aligning the incentives and goals of the project team through shared risk and reward, early involvement of all parties, and a multiparty agreement. Although there has been a huge interest in IPD i...

Full description

Main Author: Kent, David C.
Other Authors: Becerik-Gerber, Burcin
Subjects:
Online Access:Link to fulltext article --
LEADER 01815cam a2200181 7i4500
001 0000002009
005 20101125090000.0
002 000002035
100 1 0 |a Kent, David C. 
245 1 0 |a Understanding construction industry experience and attitudes toward integrated project delivery /   |c David C. Kent and Burcin Becerik-Gerber. 
520 |a Integrated project delivery (IPD) seeks to improve project outcomes through a collaborative approach of aligning the incentives and goals of the project team through shared risk and reward, early involvement of all parties, and a multiparty agreement. Although there has been a huge interest in IPD in principle, the current adoption status by the construction industry is unknown. Several professional organizations are supporting the advancement of IPD, and several projects have demonstrated its benefits; however, the amount of projects using IPD remains relatively small. This research is based on the results of a web-based survey that was designed to target a wide range of construction professionals in an effort to shed light on current status of IPD use and its future widespread adoption by the construction industry. The paper attempts to provide hard data concerning the knowledge and experience levels of construction professionals regarding IPD as well as their opinions concerning its benefits and problems as a project delivery method. 
650 0 0 |a Project delivery  
650 0 0 |a Integrated project delivery  
650 0 0 |a Construction industry  
700 1 0 |a Becerik-Gerber, Burcin  
773 0 |a Journal of Construction Engineering and Management; Augt. 2010, Vol.136, Iss. 8, pp. 815-825 
856 |u \\172.20.8.246\ilmu\artikel\J. Constr. Eng. and Mgmt\JA000082.pdf  |z Link to fulltext article --  
999 |a JA000082  |b Journal Article  |c JKR Publication  |e e-Resource